ABSTRACT
The COVID-19 pandemic has influenced the way patch testing is carried out at our tertiary centre. From July 2020 we introduced 'semi-virtual patch testing', where suitable patients remove patches at home on day 2 (D2) and take photos, which were reviewed during the D4 face-to-face appointment. Our aim was to assess the continued efficacy and practicality of this service, as well as the photo quality, patient satisfaction and environmental impact of the changes. Data were collected from patients attending patch testing at the Bristol Royal Infirmary from August to December 2021. Patients/carers were asked at their D4 clinic appointment to complete a pre-prepared questionnaire, with their consent, regarding their patch test experience. A clinician (consultant or clinical fellow) concurrently filled out a questionnaire on image quality. These data were collated with data obtained via telephone questionnaires (July-November 2020). Data were available for 181 patients (age range 0-89 years, 74.8% female and 25.2% male). Ninety-seven per cent (n = 135/139) were happy to have patch testing during the pandemic. Ninety-three per cent (n = 130/140) removed their patches at home on D2. Only 3.9% (n = 5/129) would have preferred to attend hospital. Information was provided by multiple sources: verbally by a nurse (95.2%), a doctor (60.7%), a written information sheet (88.1%) and a video (29.8%). Almost all patients (n = 127/ 136) felt confident/fairly confident removing the patches at home, and 85.0% (n = 108/127) reported it saved > 1 h. Seventy-four per cent (n = 95/129) would have had to take time off work/caring commitments to attend. Almost all patients (n = 131/135) reported that their overall experience was good or very good. Seventy per cent (n = 59/84) of patients travelled independently to their appointment, and 79.8% (n = 67/84) came by car/taxi. The mean mileage (one way) to attend the appointment was 13.3 (range 0.2-46.5;n = 98). Ninety-seven percent (n = 89/92) used a smartphone device for D2 photos. The overall presentation of the D2 reading was clear in 91.2% (n = 83/91), adequate in 6.6% (n = 6/91) and inadequate in 2.2% (n = 2/91). Image focus and colour exposure was good/adequate in 97.8% (n = 90/92) and 97.2% (n = 70/72), respectively. Virtual reading negatively affected the final interpretation of the patch test in 2.2% (n = 2/89) of patients and 9.4% (n = 16/170) would have had additional tests added on D2 if they had attended, the results of which were followed-up virtually. Our review of semi-virtual patch testing in our centre demonstrates this method as being an excellent option for most patients, with very limited adverse clinical impact. There were high levels of patient satisfaction, a reduced need for time away from work/home and a reduction in travel required. The vast majority of patients can competently remove their patch tests and produce high-quality images with good focus and colour exposure, mostly using smartphone technology.
ABSTRACT
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has contributed to changes in NHS services. From July 2020 we introduced semi-virtual patch testing, where suitable patients remove patches at home on day 2 (D2) and take photos, which are reviewed during the D4 face to face appointment. Objectives: Our aim was to assess the continued efficacy and practicality of this service, as well as the photo quality, patient satisfaction and environmental impact. Methods: Questionnaire data were collected from 181 patients/ carers attending their patch testing from July 2020 -December 2021. A clinician (consultant/ clinical fellow) concurrently completed a questionnaire on photo quality. Results: Data were available for 181 patients aged 0-89, 74.8% were females and 25.2% were male. 92.9% (130/140) removed patches at home on D2. Only 3.9% (5/129) would have preferred to attend hospital. Almost all patients (127/136) felt fairly confident/ confident removing the patches at home and reported good overall experience (131/135). 85.0% (108/127) reported saving >1 hour. 73.6% (95/129) would have had to take time off work/ caring commitments to attend on D2. 79.8% (67/84) came by car/ taxi. The mean one-way mileage was 13.3 (range 0.2-46.5). 96.7% (89/92) used a smart phone device for D2 photos. Overall presentation of the D2 reading was clear/ adequate in 97.8% (89/91). Conclusions: This method is an excellent option for most patients. There were high levels of patient satisfaction, reduced travel, and reduced work absence. Most patients can produce high quality images with good focus and colour exposure via smart phones.
ABSTRACT
Healthcare workers (HCWs) need to wear personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic. Studies from China report high rates of irritant dermatitis in frontline HCWs (Pei S, Xue Y, Zhao S et al. Occupational skin conditions on the front line: a survey among 484 Chinese healthcare professionals caring for Covid-19 patients. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2020;Epub ahead of print). The British Society of Cutaneous Allergy conducted an audit of occupational dermatoses in HCWs. Eleven centres in the U.K. and Ireland organized occupational skin disease clinics to treat PPE-related dermatoses. A standardized proforma was completed, which included information about site, dermatological history, occupation, working environment, shift pattern, sick leave, PPE and handwashing practices. Diagnosis and treatment were advised during a virtual consultation. Each participating unit entered anonymized audit data into a spreadsheet. Data from 200 HCWs were collected in May and June 2020. Forty-three per cent (n = 86) worked in England;30.5% (n = 61) in Scotland, 13.5% (n = 27) in Ireland and 13.0% (n = 26) in Wales. Median age was 36 years. Ninety per cent (n = 180) were female;67.0% (n = 134) had nursing roles. The face was affected in 46.5% (n = 93) and hands in 46.0% (n = 92). In 94.0% of cases (n = 188) the clinical findings were felt to be occupational or partially occupational, with the most common diagnosis being irritant contact dermatitis: 59.0% of patients (n = 118). Seventeen per cent (n = 35) had required time off work (292.5 days in total;range 0.5-28). The mean number of hours of PPE wear per shift was 6.9 [median 7.5, interquartile range (IQR) 4-10]. Those who wore PPE for longer periods had more time off;each hour of wearing PPE during a shift increased the time off by 0.2 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.002-0.344;P = 0.048]. The mean number of handwashes with soap per day was 22.7 (median 20, IQR 10-30). Each handwash increased the expected number of days off by 0.03 (95% CI -0.013 to 0.069;P = 0.174). The mean number of uses of alcohol gel per day was 19.2 (median 10, IQR 5-30). There was an inverse association with use of alcohol gel and time off;each use of alcohol gel per day reduced the expected number of days off by 0.03 (95% CI 0.002-0.066;P = 0.04). These data indicate that the duration of wearing PPE, frequency of handwashing and use of alcohol gel have a significant effect on the time off work for HCWs.